FROM RECURRING SYMPTOMS TO SCOPED WORK

Keep the progress. Resolve the blockers.

Founders bring MUBBITS unfinished AI-built apps and ask us to review the code and finish the project. You may have a convincing demo while login, bookings, payments or deployment remain unreliable. We start with the first customer journey you need to deliver.

A fix that keeps coming back

Trace a recurring failure, identify the assumptions behind it and make a targeted change with a check that can catch a regression.

Login, roles and customer data

Review sign-in, account recovery and who can read or change each record. Exercise the relevant user and organization boundaries.

Payments and connected services

Connect product access and business state to provider events, with defined handling for failed, delayed and repeated operations.

Features that stop halfway

Complete the agreed user journey, including validation, useful error states and the administration needed to operate it.

A preview that needs a release

Review build configuration, service accounts, environments, deployment and recovery. Prepare web or mobile release work around the actual product.

Code your next developer can own

Make scoped structural improvements, record important decisions and prepare setup and operating guidance for the agreed handover.

A BOUNDED FIRST PHASE

Leave the review with decisions you can act on.

We agree which workflows, code and dependencies the review covers. Findings connect an observed problem to its consequence, a proposed next action and the evidence needed to check the result. Launch blockers and later improvements have separate priorities.

A map of the reviewed workflow, dependencies and account responsibilities
Prioritized findings with affected behavior and supporting evidence
Preserve, repair and replace recommendations with their reasons
A proposed completion scope, acceptance checks and estimate assumptions

A review is a scoped investigation. Its coverage and any deeper security or specialist assessment are named before work starts. It can reveal a small repair, a staged completion project or a more substantial architectural decision.

Describe the blocker you want reviewed

Build toward a release you can verify.

01 / Establish the starting point

Demonstrate the app, confirm source and service access, and define the first useful release. Preserve the current version so investigation has a stable reference.

02 / Choose the work

Review the findings together. Agree the changes, dependencies, acceptance checks and owners. Estimate the completion phase after the review gives it a concrete scope.

03 / Complete and check

Implement the agreed fixes and workflows in reviewable increments. Exercise the critical journeys and relevant failure cases in the intended environment.

04 / Release and hand over

Verify the agreed deployment or distribution steps. Record setup, account responsibilities, known limitations and recovery guidance. Define any ongoing support separately.

A smaller release can be the useful choice. We help separate the workflow customers need now from features that can follow, while keeping the relevant data and operating boundaries in the launch scope.

A budget attached to the work remaining.

Start with a defined review and agree its fee and outputs. Then assess a completion estimate against the same user journey and acceptance conditions. Your proposal identifies engineering work, your team's decisions, provider charges and any ongoing arrangement.

Timing depends on the findings, access, integrations and release requirements. We establish review points and explain dependencies before committing to a schedule. A web pilot, a mobile-store release and a larger data migration require different plans.

Compare the next cash payment and the founder hours involved. Professional help can be the better investment when repeated attempts consume more than a scoped completion phase. The actual estimate determines that comparison.

Read the 70% done story and compare the next dollar and hour

Bring the app as it stands today.

A short starting brief is enough for the first conversation: what the product should do, who will use it, the tool or stack involved, a preview link if available, and the two or three blockers that keep returning. Add the release you want to reach, a budget range and any meaningful deadline.

After that conversation, we arrange source access and a test account through agreed channels. Use synthetic test data where possible. Keep production credentials and private customer records out of the inquiry form.

We confirm whether the source can be accessed or exported and which parts remain tied to a builder or provider. The plan follows your actual dependencies and account arrangements.

Start your app completion brief

Your app. Your questions.

Can you work with Lovable, Bolt, Cursor, Replit, v0 or Claude Code apps?

We can review apps built with those tools when the source code, dependencies and required access are available. We confirm the actual stack and any export or platform constraints before agreeing the work. A tool's name alone does not tell us whether the app can be transferred or which hosting setup is appropriate.

Will you fix my app or rebuild it?

The review identifies useful components, targeted repairs and any replacements that the intended product requires. We explain the affected behavior, evidence and trade-off before proposing a larger change. AI-generated code does not automatically require a rebuild; a working preview also does not prove every part is ready for real users.

Can I start with a review and decide about development later?

Yes. We can agree a bounded review as its own phase, with named outputs and a clear scope. Findings and a completion estimate help you decide the next step. The review fee, deliverables and access requirements are confirmed before that phase starts.

How much will it cost, and how long will it take?

The estimate follows the code review, remaining workflow and release dependencies. We agree the budget, assumptions, review points and schedule in the proposal. There is no universal rescue price or launch deadline. Mobile store review, unavailable vendor access or a larger data-model change can affect the plan.

Who owns the code and accounts after completion?

We agree source-code ownership, repository access, hosting and provider accounts, data responsibilities and handover in the proposal. Existing third-party licenses or builder restrictions need review too. Documentation and ongoing support are explicit parts of the scope, so you can understand the arrangement before committing.

Can you help a non-technical founder?

Yes. Start with the product's purpose, a demonstration of what works and the actions that keep failing. We translate the findings into a prioritized scope and reviewable milestones. You remain involved in product decisions and acceptance, with technical responsibilities assigned to the agreed owners.

Do you keep using AI during development?

AI assistance can remain part of the workflow where it is useful. Changes still need review and relevant verification. We agree the development setup around your code, data and operating requirements rather than making the choice of coding tool the outcome of the project.

Explore ongoing development after the handover

Vibe coding rescue.
Finish what you started.